DUPILUMAB BECOMES FIRST BIOLOGIC APPROVED FOR COPD
Dupilumab (Dupixent®) received FDA-approval to treat COPD with eosinophilic phenotype
Straight Healthcare
October 2024
October 2024
Dupilumab (Dupixent®), a monoclonal antibody that inhibits interleukin-4 (IL-4) and 13 (IL-13), recently became the first biologic approved to treat COPD. Dupilumab also has indications for asthma, atopic dermatitis, nasal polyposis, eosinophilic esophagitis, and prurigo nodularis. The COPD indication was based on two studies that found dupilumab reduced exacerbations and improved lung function, compared to placebo, in COPD patients with evidence of type 2 inflammation (defined as a blood eosinophil count ≥ 300 cells/mcl). In the BOREAS study (N=939), the annualized rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations was lower with dupilumab (0.78 vs 1.10, p<0.001), and the pre-bronchodilator FEV1 increased more with dupilumab at 52 weeks (+153 ml vs +70 ml, p<0.001). Similar results were observed in the NOTUS study (N=935), which also showed lower exacerbation rates (0.86 vs 1.30) and improved FEV1 (+139 vs +82) with dupilumab. [NOTUS abstract] Dosing in both studies was 300 mg every two weeks, and adverse events were similar to placebo.
Dupilumab, already a blockbuster drug for Regeneron and Sanofi, is now approved for COPD patients with an eosinophilic phenotype, typically defined as a blood eosinophil count consistently above 300 cells/mcl. For context, the average eosinophil count in the general adult population is 100 to 150 cells/mcl, and most labs consider a normal range to be 0 to 500 cells/mcl. Dupilumab is expensive but covered by most Medicare Part D plans, which may help many COPD patients access it.
Dupilumab, already a blockbuster drug for Regeneron and Sanofi, is now approved for COPD patients with an eosinophilic phenotype, typically defined as a blood eosinophil count consistently above 300 cells/mcl. For context, the average eosinophil count in the general adult population is 100 to 150 cells/mcl, and most labs consider a normal range to be 0 to 500 cells/mcl. Dupilumab is expensive but covered by most Medicare Part D plans, which may help many COPD patients access it.
RCT
BOREAS study - Dupilumab vs Placebo for COPD with Type 2 Inflammation, NEJM (2023) [PubMed abstract]
- The BOREAS study enrolled 939 patients with COPD and a blood eosinophil count of ≥ 300 cells/mcl, a marker of type 2 inflammation
Main inclusion criteria
- Age 40 - 80 years
- Smoking history ≥ 10 pack-years
- Blood eosinophil count ≥ 300 cells/mcl
- Spirometry consistent with COPD
- Receiving LABA+LAMA+ICS for ≥ 3 months
- Chronic bronchitis for ≥ 3 months within the past year
- 2 moderate or 1 severe exacerbation(s) within the past year
Main exclusion criteria
- COPD diagnosis for < 12 months
- Asthma diagnosis
- Other significant lung disease
- Oxygen for > 12 hours/day
Baseline characteristics
- Average age 65 years
- Current smoker - 30%
- Average pack-year - 40
- Average eosinophil count - 401
- Average exacerbations within past year - 2.3
- Average prebronchodilator FEV1 - 1.3 L
Randomized treatment groups
- Group 1 (468 patients): Dupilumab 300 mg SQ every 2 weeks for 52 weeks
- Group 2 (471 patients): Placebo
Primary outcome: Annualized rate of moderate or severe exacerbations of COPD during the 52-week trial period. Moderate exacerbations were defined as exacerbations that resulted in treatment with a systemic glucocorticoid, an
antibiotic agent, or both. Severe exacerbations were defined as exacerbations that led to hospitalization or an emergency medical care visit or that resulted in death.
Results
Duration: 52 weeks | |||
Outcome | Dupilumab | Placebo | Comparisons |
---|---|---|---|
Primary outcome | 0.78 | 1.10 | p<0.001 |
Change in prebronchodilator FEV1 (12 weeks) | +160 ml | +77 ml | p<0.001 |
Change in prebronchodilator FEV1 (52 weeks) | +153 ml | +70 ml | p<0.001 |
|
Findings: Among patients with COPD who had type 2 inflammation as indicated by elevated blood eosinophil counts, those who received dupilumab had fewer exacerbations, better lung function and quality of life, and less severe respiratory symptoms than those who received placebo.