Acronyms
- AAFP - American Academy of Family Physicians
- AAP - American Academy of Pediatrics
- ACC - American College of Cardiology
- ACE - Angiotensin converting enzyme
- ACP - American College of Physicians
- ADA - American Diabetes Association
- AF - Atrial fibrillation
- AHA - American Heart Association
- ARB - Angiotensin II receptor blocker
- BP - Blood pressure
- CAD - Coronary artery disease
- CKD - Chronic kidney disease
- CVD - Cardiovascular disease
- DBP - Diastolic blood pressure
- DM - Diabetes mellitus
- HFpEF - Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (diastolic heart failure)
- HFrEF - Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
- HTN - Hypertension
- JNC 8 - Eighth Joint National Committee
- KDIGO - Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes
- RCT - Randomized controlled trial
- SBP - Systolic blood pressure
AHA/ACC 2017/2023 HYPERTENSION GUIDELINES
AHA/ACC Blood Pressure Categories | ||
---|---|---|
Category | SBP (mmHg) | DBP (mmHg) |
Normal | < 120 | < 80 |
Elevated | 120 - 129 | < 80 |
Stage 1 hypertension✝ | 130 - 139 | 80 - 89 |
Stage 2 hypertension✝ | ≥ 140 | ≥ 90 |
AHA/ACC BP Treatment Recommendations |
---|
Patients with any of the following: CVD, HFrEF, CKD, DM, 10-year risk of CVD ≥ 10%
|
Patients with HFpEF
|
All other patients
|
AHA/ACC Medication Recommendations |
---|
Nonblack patients without comorbidities
|
Black patients without comorbidities
|
Diabetes
|
Chronic cardiovascular disease (CVD)
|
Chronic kidney disease (CKD)
|
Heart failure preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)
|
Atrial fibrillation (AF)
|
Patients with thoracic aortic disease (e.g. aneurysms)
|
Women who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant
|
JNC 8 GUIDELINES
JNC 8 Blood Pressure Goals |
---|
Adults without diabetes or chronic kidney disease
|
Adults with diabetes or chronic kidney disease
|
JNC 8 Medication Recommendations |
---|
Adults without chronic kidney disease
|
Adults with chronic kidney disease (diabetic or other)
|
ACP/AAFP 2017 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ADULTS ≥ 60 YEARS OLD
ACP/AAFP Recommendations for adults ≥ 60 years old |
---|
Adults ≥ 60 years with a history of stroke or TIA or at high risk for CVD
|
All other adults ≥ 60 years old
|
Other
|
2021 KDIGO blood pressure recommendations for CKD patients not on dialysis |
---|
Blood pressure measurement
|
Lifestyle interventions for lowering BP
|
BP goals
|
Medication choice
Medication management
|
Kidney transplant recipients
|
Children with CKD
|
AAP PEDIATRIC RECOMMENDATIONS
- Screening
- Screen all children and adolescents ≥ 3 years old annually. Children and adolescents ≥ 3 years with any of the following should be screened at every health encounter: obesity, renal disease, history of aortic arch obstruction or coarctation, diabetes, taking blood pressure-raising medications (e.g., ADHD stimulants).
- Diagnosis
- AAP blood pressure categories are provided in the table below; the second table gives the upper limits of normal by age and sex.
- Hypertension is diagnosed if auscultatory-confirmed blood pressure readings are equal to or greater than the 95th percentile at three different visits. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring should be performed if office blood pressure measurements are in the elevated category for a year or more, stage 1 hypertension is present over three clinic visits, and/or suspected white coat hypertension. [6]
AAP BLOOD PRESSURE CATEGORIES | |
---|---|
Children aged 1 - 13 years | |
Normal BP |
|
Elevated BP |
|
Stage 1 HTN |
|
Stage 2 HTN |
|
Children aged ≥ 13 years | |
Normal BP |
|
Elevated BP |
|
Stage 1 HTN |
|
Stage 2 HTN |
|
Upper limits of blood pressure by age | ||
---|---|---|
AGE (years) |
Boys (SBP/DBP) |
Girls (SBP/DBP) |
1 | 98 / 52 | 98 / 54 |
2 | 100 / 55 | 101 / 58 |
3 | 101 / 58 | 102 / 60 |
4 | 102 / 60 | 103 / 62 |
5 | 103 / 63 | 104 / 64 |
6 | 105 / 66 | 105 / 67 |
7 | 106 / 68 | 106 / 68 |
8 | 107 / 69 | 107 / 69 |
9 | 107 / 70 | 108 / 71 |
10 | 108 / 72 | 109 / 72 |
11 | 110 / 74 | 111 / 74 |
12 | 113 / 75 | 114 / 75 |
≥ 13 | 120 / 80 | 120 / 80 |
- Workup
- All children diagnosed with hypertension should have the following studies:
- Urinalysis
- Basic metabolic profile (BMP)
- Lipid panel
- Renal ultrasonography if < 6 years of age or abnormal urinalysis or renal function
- Secondary hypertension
- Signs and symptoms of secondary hypertension are provided in the table below. Patients ≥ 6 years of age do not require an extensive evaluation for secondary hypertension if they have a family history of hypertension, are overweight or obese, and/or do not have findings suggestive of secondary hypertension.
Signs of secondary hypertension |
---|
Renal disease
|
Coarctation of the aorta
|
Obstructive sleep apnea
|
Medications / Supplements
|
Congenital adrenal hyperplasia
|
Hyperaldosteronism
|
Cushing syndrome
|
Hyperthyroidism
|
Environmental exposures
|
Neurofibromatosis
|
- Treatment
- Treatment goals
- SBP and DBP < 90th percentile or < 130/80 mmHg, whichever is lower (see pediatric BP values above)
- Medications
- Initiate therapy with one of the following:
- Sports participation
- Children and adolescents with hypertension may participate in competitive sports once hypertensive target organ effects and cardiovascular risk have been assessed
STUDIES | BP GOALS
- Overview
- The three large trials below compared the effects of intensive BP targets (<120 or <130) to less stringent ones (<140 or < 150) on CVD outcomes in large patient populations.
RCT
SPRINT trial - Intensive (SBP < 120) vs Standard (SBP < 140) Blood Pressure Control for CVD Outcomes, NEJM (2015)
[PubMed abstract]
- The SPRINT trial enrolled 9361 patients with a SBP ≥ 130 mmHg who were at increased risk of cardiovascular disease
Main inclusion criteria
- Age ≥ 50 years
- SBP 130 - 180 mmHg
- Increased cardiovascular risk defined as ≥ 1 of the following: clinical or subclinical cardiovascular disease (except stroke), chronic kidney disease (CrCl 20 - < 60 ml/min), 10-year heart attack risk of ≥ 15% (Framingham risk calculator), age ≥ 75 years
Main exclusion criteria
- Diabetes
- History of stroke
- Symptomatic heart failure within the past 6 months or EF < 35%
Baseline characteristics
- Average age 68 years
- Chronic kidney disease - 28%
- Average SBP - 140 mmHg
- Average DBP - 78 mmHg
- Average Framingham 10-year risk - 20%
Randomized treatment groups
- Group 1 (4678 patients) - Target SBP < 120 mmHg (Intensive)
- Group 2 (4683 patients) - Target SBP < 140 mmHg (Standard)
- There was no set treatment algorithm; patients could receive any blood pressure medication(s). Certain medications were encouraged in the study protocol - thiazides as first-line agents, loop diuretics for chronic kidney disease, beta blockers for CAD. Chlorthalidone was recommended as the primary thiazide diuretic. Amlodipine was the recommended calcium channel blocker.
Primary outcome: Composite of myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome not resulting in myocardial infarction,
stroke, acute decompensated heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes
Results
Duration: After a median of 3.26 years, the study was stopped early because the intensive group was superior | |||
Outcome | Intensive | Standard | Comparisons |
---|---|---|---|
Average SBP during follow-up | 121.5 | 134.6 | N/A |
Average number of BP meds | 2.8 | 1.8 | N/A |
Primary outcome | 5.2% | 6.8% | HR 0.75, 95%CI [0.64 - 0.89], p<0.001 |
Myocardial infarction | 2.1% | 2.5% | HR 0.83, 95%CI [0.64 - 1.09], p=0.19 |
Acute coronary syndrome | 0.9% | 0.9% | HR 1.0, 95%CI [0.64 - 1.55], p=0.99 |
Stroke | 1.3% | 1.5% | HR 0.89, 95%CI [0.63 - 1.25], p=0.50 |
Heart failure | 1.3% | 2.1% | HR 0.62, 95%CI [0.45 - 0.84], p=0.002 |
Death from cardiovascular cause | 0.8% | 1.4% | HR 0.57, 95%CI [0.38 - 0.85], p=0.005 |
Death from any cause | 3.3% | 4.5% | HR 0.73, 95%CI [0.60 - 0.90], p=0.003 |
Hypotension | 3.4% | 2.0% | p<0.001 |
Syncope | 3.5% | 2.4% | p=0.003 |
Electrolyte abnormality | 3.8% | 2.8% | p=0.006 |
Acute kidney injury/failure | 4.4% | 2.6% | p<0.001 |
|
Findings: Among patients at high risk for cardiovascular events but without diabetes, targeting a systolic blood pressure of less than 120 mm Hg, as compared with less than 140 mm Hg, resulted in lower rates of fatal and nonfatal major cardiovascular events and death from any cause, although significantly higher rates of some adverse events were observed in the intensive-treatment group.
RCT
SPRINT Subgroup Analysis of Participants ≥ 75 Years Old at Randomization, JAMA (2016)
[PubMed abstract]
- A subgroup analysis of the SPRINT trial looked at the 2636 patients who were ≥ 75 years old at randomization
Duration: After a median follow-up of 3.14 years, the study was stopped early because the intensive group was better | |||
Outcome | Intensive | Standard | Comparisons |
---|---|---|---|
Average BP during follow-up | 123/62 | 135/67 | N/A |
Average number of BP meds | 2.6 | 1.8 | N/A |
Primary outcome | 7.7% | 11.2% | HR 0.66, 95%CI [0.51 - 0.85], p=0.001 |
Myocardial infarction | 2.8% | 4.0% | HR 0.69, 95%CI [0.45 - 1.05], p=0.09 |
Acute coronary syndrome | 1.3% | 1.3% | HR 1.03, 95%CI [0.52 - 2.04], p=0.94 |
Stroke | 2.1% | 2.6% | HR 0.72, 95%CI [0.43 - 1.21], p=0.22 |
Heart failure | 2.7% | 4.2% | HR 0.62, 95%CI [0.40 - 0.95], p=0.03 |
Death from cardiovascular cause | 1.4% | 2.2% | HR 0.60, 95%CI [0.33 - 1.09], p=0.09 |
Death from any cause | 5.5% | 8.1% | HR 0.67, 95%CI [0.49 - 0.91], p=0.009 |
Hypotension event | 3.3% | 2.0% | HR 1.66, 95%CI [1.03 - 2.73], p=0.039 |
Syncope | 4.3% | 3.3% | HR 1.28, 95%CI [0.85 - 1.92], p=0.240 |
Electrolyte abnormality | 4.6% | 3.3% | HR 1.44, 95%CI [0.97 - 2.16], p=0.067 |
Fall with injury | 11.6% | 14.1% | HR 0.80, 95%CI [0.64 - 0.99], p=0.040 |
Kidney injury/failure | 5.5% | 4.2% | HR 1.39, 95%CI [0.97 - 1.99], p=0.072 |
|
Findings: Among ambulatory adults aged 75 years or older, treating to an SBP target of less than 120 mm Hg compared with an SBP target of less than 140 mm Hg resulted in significantly lower rates of fatal and nonfatal major cardiovascular events and death from any cause.
RCT
STEP study - Intensive (SBP < 130) vs Standard (SBP < 150) Blood Pressure Control in Older Patients with Hypertension, NEJM (2021) [PubMed abstract]
- The STEP study enrolled 8511 Chinese patients 60 - 80 years old with hypertension
Main inclusion criteria
- 60 - 80 years of age
- SBP 140 - 190 mmHg or taking BP meds
- Han ethnicity
Main exclusion criteria
- History of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
- MI within 6 months
- PCI or CABG within 12 months
- NYHA class III - IV heart failure
- HgA1C > 8%
Baseline characteristics
- Average age 66 years
- Average BMI - 26
- Average BP - 146/82
- Diabetes - 19%
- History of CVD - 6.3%
- Current smoker - 16%
Randomized treatment groups
- Group 1 (4243 patients): SBP target of 110 to <130 mmHg (Intensive group)
- Group 2 (4268 patients): SBP target of 130 to <150 mmHg (Standard group)
- Treatment was standardized with an algorithm that included olmesartan, amlodipine, and HCTZ
- Patients were seen every 3 months, and all were given home BP machines that uploaded readings to a data center. Patients were required to measure their home BP at least once a week.
Primary outcome: Composite of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), acute coronary syndrome (acute myocardial infarction and hospitalization for unstable angina), acute decompensated heart failure, coronary revascularization, atrial fibrillation, or death
from cardiovascular causes
Results
Duration: Median of 3.34 years | |||
Outcome | Intensive | Standard | Comparisons |
---|---|---|---|
Average BP during follow-up | 127/76 | 136/79 | N/A |
Average number of BP meds | 1.9 | 1.5 | N/A |
Primary outcome | 3.5% | 4.6% | HR 0.74 95%CI [0.60 - 0.92], p=0.007 |
Stroke | 1.1% | 1.7% | HR 0.67 95%CI [0.47 - 0.97] |
Acute coronary syndrome | 1.3% | 1.9% | HR 0.67 95%CI [0.47 - 0.94] |
Acute heart failure | 0.1% | 0.3% | HR 0.27 95%CI [0.08 - 0.98] |
Coronary revascularization | 0.5% | 0.7% | HR 0.69 95%CI [0.40 - 1.18] |
Atrial fib | 0.6% | 0.6% | HR 0.96 95%CI [0.55 - 1.68] |
Death from CV cause | 0.4% | 0.6% | HR 0.72 95%CI [0.39 - 1.32] |
Overall mortality | 1.6% | 1.5% | HR 1.11 95%CI [0.78 - 1.56] |
Hypotension | 3.4% | 2.6% | HR 1.31 95%CI [1.02 - 1.68], p=0.03 |
|
Findings: In older patients with hypertension, intensive treatment with a systolic blood pressure target of 110 to less than 130 mmHg resulted in a lower incidence of cardiovascular events than standard treatment with a target of 130 to less than
150 mmHg
- RCTESPRIT study - Intensive (SBP < 120) vs Standard (SBP < 140) Blood Pressure Control in Patients at High Risk for CVD Events, Lancet (2024) [PubMed abstract]
- Design: Randomized open-label trial (N=11,255 | length = median 3.4 years) in Chinese patients at high risk for CVD events
- Treatment: Intensive (SBP < 120) BP control vs Standard (SBP < 140) BP control
- Primary outcome: Composite of myocardial infarction, revascularization, hospitalization for heart failure, stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes
- Results:
- Average SBP during follow-up: Intensive - 119.1 mmHg, Standard - 134.8 mmHg
- Primary outcome: Intensive - 9.7%, Standard - 11.1% (p=0.028)
- Findings: For hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk, regardless of the status of diabetes or history of stroke, the treatment strategy of targeting systolic blood pressure of less than 120 mmHg, as compared with that of less than 140 mmHg, prevents major vascular events, with minor excess risk.
- Summary
- Collectively, these three studies show that lower BP targets (<120-130) reduce the risk of CVD events across large populations. The absolute risk reduction is small (1.1 - 1.6%) but meaningful when considering the number of people with hypertension. Similar studies in diabetics have had conflicting results but generally support a lower target (see blood pressure goals in diabetics). Studies in patients with symptomatic lacunar infarcts and strokes have also been performed. [PMID 23726159, PMID 31355878]
STUDIES | MORNING VS EVENING DOSING
- Overview
- CVD events are more common in the morning hours when cortisol levels rise, and BP tends to run higher. Most BP meds are dosed once daily, meaning trough levels occur 24 hours after intake. Morning dosing causes trough levels to coincide with the period of greatest CVD risk. Theoretically, bedtime dosing, which reverses the pattern, may help lower CVD risk. Two large studies comparing bedtime to awakening dosing of BP meds are detailed below.
- RCTBedtime vs Awakening Dosing of Blood Pressure Medications , European Heart Journal (2019) [PubMed abstract]
- Design: Randomized controlled trial (N=19,084 | length = median 6.3 years) in patients with hypertension being treated with ≥ 1 antihypertensive medication(s)
- Treatment: Take all BP medications at bedtime vs Take all BP meds upon awakening
- Primary outcome: Composite of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, heart failure, ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke, and CVD death
- Results:
- Primary outcome: Bedtime to awakening hazard ratio 0.55 (95%CI [0.50–0.61]), p <0.001
- Findings: Routine ingestion by hypertensive patients of ≥ 1 prescribed BP-lowering medications at bedtime, as opposed to upon waking, results in improved ambulatory BP control (significantly enhanced decrease in asleep BP and increased sleeptime relative BP decline, i.e. BP dipping) and, most importantly, markedly diminished occurrence of major CVD events.
- RCTTIME study - Morning vs Evening Dosing of Blood Pressure Medications, Lancet (2022) [PubMed abstract]
- Design: Randomized controlled trial (N=21,104 | length = median 5.2 years) in adults with hypertension taking at least one antihypertensive
- Treatment: Take all BP meds in the morning (0600 - 1000 h) vs Take all BP meds in the evening (2000 - 0000 h)
- Primary outcome: Composite of vascular death or hospitalization for non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke
- Results:
- Primary outcome: Morning - 3.7%, Evening - 3.4% (p=0.53)
- Findings: Evening dosing of usual antihypertensive medication was not different from morning dosing in terms of major cardiovascular outcomes. Patients can be advised that they can take their regular antihypertensive medications at a convenient time that minimizes any undesirable effects.
- Summary
- The effects of bedtime versus morning dosing were mixed in the two trials above, with one finding a benefit and the other none. Both studies were large and similar in design, making it difficult to favor one over the other. Additional trials evaluating the effects of dose timing are underway. Given the current evidence, patients should be advised to take their medications at a time that optimizes their compliance.
STUDIES | BLACKS
- RCTAmlodipine + Perindopril or HCTZ vs Perindopril + HCTZ for HTN in Blacks, NEJM (2019) [PubMed abstract]
- Design: Randomized controlled trial (N=621 | length = 6 months) in black patients with uncontrolled hypertension
- Treatment: Amlodipine 10 mg/HCTZ 25 mg vs Amlodipine 10 mg/Perindopril 8 mg vs Perindopril 8 mg/HCTZ 25 mg
- Primary outcome: Change in the 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure between baseline and 6 months
- Results:
- Primary outcome: Amlodipine/HCTZ was 3.14 mmHg lower than Perindopril/HCTZ (p=0.03). Amlodipine/Perindopril was 3.00 mmHg lower than Perindopril/HCTZ (p=0.04). There was no significant difference between Amlodipine/HCTZ and Amlodipine/Perindopril (p=0.92)
- Findings: These findings suggest that in black patients in sub-Saharan Africa, amlodipine plus either hydrochlorothiazide or perindopril was more effective than perindopril plus hydrochlorothiazide at lowering blood pressure at 6 months.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
- 1 - PMID 24352797
- 2 - PMID 25829340
- 3 - PMID 28135725 - Pharmacologic Treatment of Hypertension in Adults Aged 60 Years or Older to Higher Versus Lower Blood Pressure Targets: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians and the American Academy of Family Physicians, Annals of Internal Medicine (2017)
- 4 - ADA Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2016
- 5 - PMID 27979887 - ADA Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes - 2017: Summary of Revisions
- 6 - PMID 28827377 - Clinical Practice Guideline for Screening and Management of High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents, Pediatrics (2017)
- 7 - PMID 29133356 - 2017 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension (2017)
- 8 - PMID 34152826 - Management of Blood Pressure in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Not Receiving Dialysis: Synopsis of the 2021 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline, Ann Intern Med (2021)
- 9 - PMID 37471501 - 2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines, Circulation (2023)